The Routine Daily News

+  

   

"'Happiness is the aim of life, but virtue is the foundation of happiness,' Jefferson observed toward the end of his career, echoing Franklin's observation that 'virtue and happiness are mother and daughter.' A commonplace of classical philosophy, as dear to Aristotle as it was to Cicero, the statement captures well what few, if any, of the Founding Fathers would have denied. Endorsed by the principal authorities on which Jefferson drew in drafting the Declaration, his statement nonetheless reveals an inherent tension in the opposition of its second clause that is also the tension of the American experiment. Happiness indeed was the aim of life. And virtue, self-discipline, the ordered arrangement of desire were indeed the way to that end. But whether the goal itself could be fulfilled depended on individual decision and choice; happiness could never be imposed. And in that liberty—that freedom—lay a dilemma. For as Smith clearly recognized, and as he argued at length in The Wealth of Nations, 'augmentation in fortune is the means by which the greater part of men propose and wish to better their condition.' The greater part of men, that is, pursued happiness through wealth, a route that the so-called father of capitalism knew to be a devious path. And although this 'deception,' this trivial pursuit, was undeniably a powerful engine of growth, it was a dubious means to lasting satisfaction. Smith himself denied the connection, as did Jefferson, Franklin, and many others." Darrin McMahon


   

"As a writer, Obama's strength is telling stories, and his account of America is a kind of story, mixing social, intellectual, and political history. It begins with the Founding—with the Declaration of Independence and Constitution. He tries to construct a new consensus view of the country that acknowledges and then contextualizes traditional views in a way meant to be reassuring but that points to very untraditional conclusions. For instance, in The Audacity of Hope, in a chapter titled 'Values,' he quotes the Declaration's famous sentence on self-evident truths and then comments:
Those simple words are our starting point as Americans; they describe not only the foundations of our government but the substance of our common creed. Not every American may be able to recite them; few, if asked, could trace the genesis of the Declaration of Independence to its roots in eighteenth-century liberal and republican thought. But the essential idea behind the Declaration—that we are born into this world free, all of us; that each of us arrives with a bundle of rights that can't be taken away by any person or any state without just cause; that through our own agency we can, and must, make of our lives what we will—is one that every American understands.
It sounds almost Lincolnian until one notices that the rights in this bundle are not said to be natural, exactly, nor true and certainly not self-evident; they are an outgrowth of 18th century political thought, too recondite for most Americans to know or remember. Abraham Lincoln, when explaining the Declaration, traced its central idea to God and nature, not to 18th century ideologies. He called for 'all honor to Jefferson' for introducing 'into a merely revolutionary document, an abstract truth, applicable to all men and all times.' When Jefferson was asked about the document’s source and purpose, he looked to common sense as well as to a much older and richer philosophical tradition." Charles Kesler