The Routine Daily News: January 2014

+  

     

"When Americans are asked about dangers today, they are likely first to mention terrorists, plane crashes, and nuclear accidents, even though those three dangers combined have killed far fewer Americans over the last four decades combined than do cars, alcohol, or smoking in any single year. When Americans' rankings of risks are compared with actual annual deaths caused (or with probability of death per hour of the risky activity), it turns out that people greatly overrate the risk of nuclear reactor accidents (ranked as the number-one danger by American college students and women voters), and also overrate the risks of DNA-based technologies, other new chemical technologies, and spray cans. Americans underrate the risks of alcohol, cars, and smoking, and (to a lesser extent) of surgery, home appliances, and food preservatives. Underlying these biases of ours are that we especially fear events beyond our control, events with the potential for killing lots of people, and situations involving new, unfamiliar, or hard-to-assess risks (hence our fear of terrorists, plane crashes, and nuclear reactor accidents). Conversely, we are inappropriately accepting of old familiar risks that appear to be within our control, that we accept voluntarily, and that kill individuals rather than groups of people. That's why we underrate the risks of driving cars, alcohol, smoking, and standing on step-ladders: we choose to do those things, we feel that we control them, and we know that they kill other people, but we think that they won't kill us because we consider ourselves careful and strong. As Chauncey Starr expressed it, 'We are loath to let others do unto us what we happily do to ourselves.'" Jared Diamond


     

"The maid-servant in Victoria has all the pertness, the independence, the mode of asserting by her manner that though she brings you up your hot water, she is just as good as you—and a good deal better if she be younger—which is common to the American 'helps.' But in Victoria, as in the States, the offensiveness of this—for us who are old-fashioned it is in a certain degree offensive—is compensated by a certain intelligence and instinctive good-sense which convinces the observer that however much he may suffer, however heavily the young woman may tread upon his toes, she herself has a good time in the world. She is not degraded in her own estimation by her own employment, and has no idea of being humble because she brings you hot water. And when we consider that the young woman serves us for her own purposes, and not for ours, we cannot rationally condemn her. The spirit which has made this bearing so common in the United States—where indeed it is hardly so universal now as it used to be—has grown in Victoria and has permeated all classes. One has to look very closely before one can track it and trace it to be the same in the elegantly equipped daughter of the millionaire who leads the fashion in Melbourne, and in the little housemaid—but it is the same. The self-dependence, the early intelligence, the absence of reverence, the contempt for all weakness—even feminine weakness—the indifference to the claims of age, the bold self-assertion, have sprung both in the one class and in the other from the rapidity with which success in life has been gained." Anthony Trollope